Blinken sounds a rallying cry for a ‘new cold war’ that US cannot win

By Global Times

The growing US’ geopolitical competition with Russia and China marks the end of the post-Cold War world order, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, speaking at the Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies on Wednesday. “What we are experiencing now is more than a test of the post-Cold War order. It’s the end of it,” he noted. “Decades of relative geopolitical stability have given way to an intensifying competition with authoritarian powers, revisionist powers.” This statement appears to be a rallying cry for a “new cold war.”

Since the post-Cold War order is coming to an end, what kind of new world order does the US want? Various signs indicate that the US wants major power competition and camp confrontation in order to maintain its global hegemony, even at the expense of the interests of other countries, including allies, and partner nations. However, the reality is that major power competition goes against the trend of the times and cannot solve the US’ own problems and the challenges facing the world. It will only further divide the world, leading the world to slide toward a more dangerous cliff edge.

Regarding Blinken’s remarks, there are two main points to consider. Firstly, Blinken was creating a sense of crisis in the world. The underlying message to US allies and other countries is that there are challengers, particularly China and Russia, who want to change the existing order. Secondly, Blinken’s remarks also reflect a sense of anxiety in the US. The US is attempting to slow down China’s rise through strategic competition, while hoping to sustain its hegemony without jeopardizing its own interests. However, it seems that the US has no clear solution to this dilemma.

China is one of the beneficiaries of the existing system and does not seek to challenge or subvert this order. However, the US has viewed any legitimate demand made by China, even those that reflect the reasonable demands of the majority of developing countries, as a challenge and ill-intentioned sabotage.

Xin Qiang, deputy director of the American Studies Center of Fudan University, believes that US irrational crackdown on China will only irritate China and other developing countries. Many developing countries share common demands with China, but the US opposes whatever China proposes and intends to strangle its legitimate right for development. This will ultimately lead to the destruction of the existing international order and be counterproductive to the US’ goals.

The US believes that by containing China, it will gain an advantage. However, whatever damage they’re doing to China, it also backfires on the US and even the world.

The US now sees China as a competitor and challenger, opposing and obstructing anything that may benefit China, regardless of its impact on the US. This approach not only fails to maintain US hegemony but also leads it further away from the right direction.

Today, the US is embroiled in simultaneous confrontations with China and Russia. The US needs to think carefully, as it will be more difficult to engage in a “new cold war” compared to the previous one. In the 1970s, the US GDP accounted for nearly one-third of the global total, but now it is only one-fourth. Its two major opponents are the nuclear power Russia and the economic powerhouse China. In order to defeat Russia, the US must ultimately dismantle its nuclear deterrence, which would be a thrilling adventure.

As for China, the US is attempting to stifle its development by imposing unlimited technological restrictions, but it is unable to completely decouple from China economically. For the US and its main allies, China is either their largest single trading partner or one of the largest. Today, the US is a reckless strategic aggressor, attempting to unite its relatively weaker strength with its allies to wage a new cold war. It should be noted that the power of US allies has declined significantly, and the unity of the “West” is crippled due to the US transitioning from a “blood donor” to a “vampire”.

The current generation of American elites arrogantly seeks to replicate the victory of the Cold War, but they will never succeed. Instead, the US will face a different ending.

Views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.


Posted

in

by

Comments

7 responses to “Blinken sounds a rallying cry for a ‘new cold war’ that US cannot win”

  1. Guy St Hilaire Avatar
    Guy St Hilaire

    Vampire is the key word and has always existed in the mega vulture capitalistic ,take no prisoners world.It is only that now it is being exposed as in the emperor has no clothes.

    1. Damien Flinter Avatar

      i.e. para$itism.
      The limited liability company is designed for just that. To limit responsibility for the externalised consequences of its predatory actions, thus shredding even the slight feudal noblesse oblige that meant privilege must bear responsibilities to those it has dispossessed by claim-jumping the public resource of the commons lands it had enclosed.
      The Dutch and British East Indian Companies led the charge of this £ic€n$ed pillage.

  2. Robert Billyard Avatar

    Sadly the USA is mired down in the last century and refuses to face the realities and challenges of the 21st century. The emerging multipolar world has unstoppable momentum. Where it chooses to wage war on the world it should be focused on fundamental changes at home waging peace and prosperity for its population. Blinken’s world view is utterly self-destructive and will eventfully marginalize America while the rest of the world moves on.

  3. Dick Pritchard Avatar
    Dick Pritchard

    The US and the people that we vote for to operate the US are amazingly out of touch with reality. The people we vote for have very little say in foreign policy because the foreign policy is controlled by people like Victoria Nuland and her ilk who are in lockstep with evangelicals and AIPAC. As Ariel Sharon, butcher of the Middle East, said in 2001, “we the Jewish people control America”.

  4. Dick Pritchard Avatar
    Dick Pritchard

    The US and the people that we vote for to operate the US are amazingly out of touch with reality. The people we vote for have very little say in foreign policy because the foreign policy is controlled by people like Victoria Nuland and her ilk who are in lockstep with evangelicals and AIPAC. As Ariel Sharon, butcher of the Middle East, said in 2001, “we the Jewish people control America”. Ok please delete this comment and I’ll be on my way as I don’t have time to waste here. 🙂

    1. Disadvantaged Avatar
      Disadvantaged

      Mr. Pritchard:

      An outstanding reply and I agree with your comment. I have a printed article regarding what Ariel Sharon said and it is true. Also, the Secretary of State mentioned in the article is Jewish. In fact, many of the important top positions in the Biden administration are Jewish. I already checked.

  5. Carl Zaisser Avatar
    Carl Zaisser

    Even Zbigniew Brzezinski, in his treatise advocating and outlining a plan for US global hegemony, “The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives”, made it clear, albeit briefly, that such a US plan would never succeed without the US making constructive accommodations with both Russia and China. So how’s that going?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Information Clearing House.info

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading

%d bloggers like this: