“Breaking AIPAC.”

AIPAC’s control prevents the U.S. from addressing Israel’s alleged war crimes and ethnic cleansing in Gaza independently. Breaking AIPAC’s dominance is crucial for peace in West Asia.

By Cara MariAnna

AIPAC at work. Gaza, 1 November. ((BBC screen shot.) “. . . the United States will not be able to deal with the vexing problems in the Middle East if it cannot have a serious and candid discussion of the role of the Israel lobby.” —John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. 

2 NOVEMBER—Two weeks ago, as Israel continued bombing Gaza into a wasteland, the president of the United States sat with Israel’s prime minister at the start of an Israeli war cabinet meeting. Netanyahu had phoned Biden two days previously to request what The Times of Israel called a “solidarity visit.”

Much has passed since Biden’s visit to Israel. The atrocity of Israel’s indiscriminate military campaign in Gaza is now widely recognized as constituting a genocide. Principled non–Western nations—Bolivia, Chile, Columbia to date—began this week to sever relations with Tel Aviv or recall their ambassadors. The world order, as should be obvious, has been disrupted.

But questions remain. What does solidarity, as Biden pledges, mean when Israel is daily committing war crimes for all the world to see? Why is the U.S., in violation of international law and everything it claims to stand for, aiding and abetting Israel’s agenda of ethnic cleansing in Gaza? Why, bringing matters closer to home, is the United States prioritizing the interests and security of Israel above its own, while simultaneously damaging its credibility and authority abroad?

Click Here ToGet Our FREE Newsletter No Advertising – No Government Grants – This Is Independent Media

It isn’t possible to understand American conduct in West Asia at this critical moment without recognizing the role that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee plays in setting foreign policy. U.S. foreign policy aligns so congruently with AIPAC’s agenda that there is little distinction between them. In effect, the U.S. lacks an independent foreign policy that reflects its own security interests in that region of the world. 

At this critical moment of violence, human suffering, and chaos, we must recognize that AIPAC, an unelected, technically nongovernmental agency, exercises an excessive, wholly inappropriate influence in global affairs as well as in U.S. politics. This is very rarely mentioned in our corporate media, and we can read this silence as a measure of the organization’s unacceptable accumulation of power. AIPAC, it is time to conclude, must be broken. Peace in West Asia and a stable order elsewhere depend on this project. 

AIPAC’s influence on U.S. policy, domestic as well as foreign, has been considered many times. Most notably, there is the work of John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, whose 2008 book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, stands as the most extensive examination of AIPAC’s power we have to date. Their analysis is now more pertinent than ever. In the current context, given the magnitude of what is unfolding—given its potential impact on relationships among many different nations—we must recognize that AIPAC’s reach extends well beyond Washington or West Asia. Indeed, the committee’s influence now marks world affairs altogether. This is our disturbing new reality. 

With this reality in mind—a dangerous reality given the extremist character of this organization—let’s consider Biden’s recent visit to Israel and all that has followed from it. 

Biden has given two speeches since that war cabinet meeting, one in Tel Aviv on 18 October, the other upon returning to Washington, when he addressed the American public on 20 October. In each, the president reiterated all of the talking points and established dogma that have long characterized America’s relationship with Israel, all of which support Israeli priorities. Nothing new was offered—no moral clarity, no fresh vision of how to address the original moral crime committed against the Palestinians when their homeland was taken from them 75 years ago, a theft of land that accounts for the never-ending cycle of violence we witness once again.

Two factors explain Biden’s failure: First and obviously, this president isn’t capable of statesmanship of the magnitude required. Moreover, he professes a deep personal affinity for the Zionist vision—for Israel to seize all the lands of Biblical Palestine as its own—and no incentive to do anything other than align himself with Israel’s interest. More important and directly to my point, with Biden serving as an almost perfect example: No new thinking and no new policies are ever possible because of AIPAC’s stranglehold on U.S. elections, politics, and politicians. 

Via The Federalist

Click Here To Support Independent Media: People For Global Justice – Since 2001

Views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

8 responses to ““Breaking AIPAC.””

  1. Rafe Garcia Avatar
    Rafe Garcia

    I call it the “Manchurian Candidate Syndrome” by which American Jewish dual citizenship proliferates congress and public held office holders thereby following zionist policies best interests instead of those of the U.S.

  2. Jack Lomax Avatar
    Jack Lomax

    The Zionists have controlled US foreign and domestic policy towards Israel every since it was illicitly founded via Zionist control over America and heavy Zionist influences on the USSR via the control of Zionists in its founding revolutionary Bolshevik Party.And of course the earlier UK Balfour declaration which was the result of the UK Foreign Minister Lord Balfour a Jew and Baron Rothschild a prominent vastly rich Zionist agreeing that if the Zionists put money into the failing UK war chest and used their powerful interests to bring the US into the war on the side of the UK they would acknowledge the Jews as the rightful citizens of Palestine. The Brits by the way had an internationally acknowledged Mandate of Palestine at that time .

    1. Christie Avatar
      Christie

      Lord Balfour was not a Jew, he was a Christian anti-Semite. Please read up on Balfour’s attitudes before the Declaration. See also this article:

      https://www.timesofisrael.com/christian-zionists-funding-israel-immigration-still-scares-jews/

      Who first said, “Palestine is a land without a people for a people without a land?” referring to the Jews? Hint: not Theodor Herzl.

      The long-time Zionist motto was actually coined by evangelical Christian leaders who used it some five decades prior to the father of Zionism’s quest for a Jewish homeland.

  3. gcw919 Avatar
    gcw919

    Its time to get rid of ALL campaign donations, and go to publicly funded elections. Lobbyists should be prohibited from all donations, down to a cup of coffee. And we should have term limits, so these Congressional parasites don’t make careers out of getting rich at the public expense.

  4. Woopy Avatar
    Woopy

    Just read that Netanyahu said if he doesn’t win the war in Gaza then Gaza fighters will fight the US. So Netanyahu is telling us that he is our savior because he is murdering children and women. How sick is this guy?

  5. Chippy Orendain Avatar
    Chippy Orendain

    When will the free world stop it’s fence-sitting in allowing the fascist Netanyahu to lord it over in Palestine? It is frustrating to see how so many innocents are getting killed by the murderous hordes of the Zionist Israeli military. Disgusting and horrifying to say the least!!!

  6. Carl Zaisser Avatar
    Carl Zaisser

    I was actually hoping this article would lay out a program for accomplishing what it states is necessary to be done. Rather, it is a very short incapsulation of what Mearsheimer and Walt wrote more than fifteen years ago, first in their 40 page seminal paper, then followed up in their book cited in the article. I read them both, and heard the two professors speak in Vienna. The question is, where’s the plan for exposing AIPAC to the point where it doesn’t have this power on Capitol Hill? And Americans are told, and do believe, that RUSSIA is the country which is a danger to the US government and way of life. First and foremost, US militarism is the #1 danger. Israeli control over Washington is #2.

    1. Woopy Avatar
      Woopy

      Carl, dismantling AIPAC is more difficult than it appears on the surface. AIPAC is made up of more than 60 different organizations that often can’t be identified and are usually “nonprofit”, so they don’t pay taxes. All these appendages are interrelated with other organizations making it very difficult to deal with. One thing might be to simply pull the string on anything done by the white Jewish mafia in this country, however that will bring out their usual mantras of “we are victims”, “you are an anti-Semite” etc. The white supremacist mafia tentacles go deep like a bad cancer that can’t be cured. We need to take it apart piece by piece no matter how long it takes and it will take a long time.

Discover more from Information Clearing House.info

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Information Clearing House.info

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading