Xi Jinping is Right About the U.S. Empire

Xi believes that as China’s economic strength grows, it pressures western dominance, resulting in a strategic backlash.

By Jacob G. Hornberger

On the eve of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s current visit to the United States, the New York Times published an article detailing some of Xi’s thoughts about the United States.

The article states: 

In Mr. Xi’s telling, China sought to rise peacefully, but Western powers would not accept the idea that a Communist-led China was catching up and could someday overtake them in global primacy. The West would never stop trying to derail China’s ascent and topple its Communist Party, he said in speeches to the military that are largely unreported by the media.

In 2015, Xi told military commanders: “Some Western countries absolutely never want to see a socialist China grow strong under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.”

The Times writes that Xi’s speeches “voiced an almost fatalistic conviction … that China’s rise would prompt a backlash from Western rivals seeking to maintain their dominance.” Xi told Chinese Air Force officers in 2014, “The faster we develop, the bigger the external shock will be, and the greater the strategic blowback.” According to the Times, “In Mr. Xi’s worldview, the West has sought to subvert the Chinese Communist Party’s power at home and contain the country’s influence abroad.”

We Need Your HELP: Click Here To Support Independent Media: People For Global Justice – Since 2001

(Brasília – DF, 13/11/2019) Presidente da República Popular da China, Xi Pinping.Foto: Alan Santos/PR. Licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

The problem, one that all too many Americans are loathe to confront, is that Xi Jinping is right about the U.S. Empire. 

Throughout history, empires have loathed rivals, opponents, adversaries, and competitors. They do everything they can to prevent them from rising, including the imposition of harmful economic measures but even going so far as to initiate wars against them, all with the aim of weakening what they perceive as a rising rival to their empire.

Of course, such measures inevitably also damage the people living in the empire, but the idea is that the empire, because it is already economically stronger, can withstand the economic deprivation better than the targeted nation, which ordinarily has a lower standard of living.

For decades after the Communist Party took control over China, the Party established and maintained a strict socialist system, one in which the government owned and controlled most everything. The result was massive poverty across the land, which, of course, meant a Chinese communist government with relatively few resources.

Then a few decades ago, China began liberalizing its economy, permitting the Chinese people to engage in economic enterprise, engage in trade, open businesses, and accumulate large amounts of wealth. The result was a tremendous increase in economic prosperity.

For a time, Americans celebrated this economic phenomenon. And why not? For decades, many Americans had criticized China’s socialist system precisely because it generated so much poverty among the Chinese people. Now the standard of living of people was soaring. Why wouldn’t everyone celebrate the fact that people in other parts of the world are escaping poverty? 

Moreover, the rising prosperity in China meant that the Chinese people were increasingly able to purchase goods and services from Americans. The resulting trade made everyone better off.

But the U.S. Empire — specifically, the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA — saw trouble in all this. That’s because China’s economic prosperity meant vast new tax revenues for the Chinese communist regime — resources that enabled the regime to increase the size of its military and also to increase its influence around the world. 

During the 20 years that the U.S. government was waging war against the people of Afghanistan and Iraq, China had no such burden. Rather than using its tax revenues to kill large numbers of people, as the U.S. Empire was doing, China was using them to expand its influence around the world by helping countries with big, grandiose socialist projects. 

Thus, in the eyes of the U.S. national-security establishment, China’s rise posed a grave threat to its post-Cold War role as the world’s sole remaining empire. Something had to be done to bring China down, even if it harmed the American people at the same time. By suppressing China’s economic prosperity, the empire aimed to diminish the amount of tax revenues flowing into the Chinese government’s coffers, thereby limiting its ability to expand its military and its influence around the world. 

It’s just the way empires have always worked. Questions naturally arises though for the American people: Is it right for the U.S. government to be wreaking economic damage on the people of another country? Indeed, is it right for the U.S. government to even be an empire?

Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas.

Click Here ToGet Our FREE Newsletter No Advertising – No Government Grants – This Is Independent Media






7 responses to “Xi Jinping is Right About the U.S. Empire”

  1. Woopy Avatar

    In the US foreign policy of “comply or die” everything is a threat to them, and that’s obvious when looking at the 800 or so military bases they have placed all over the planet. The axis of evil, the US, Israel, and the UK are the most paranoid people to ever exist on this planet and attack countries at will like in Ukraine and the concentration camp of Gaza or Iraq, Libya etc. in reality the white supremacy of Israel has more authority over the US government than its taxpayers. How much worse can it get?

    1. John Roberts Avatar
      John Roberts

      This article typifies European and especially American thinking; the standard narrative when discussing the rise of China: that capitalism is better than communism or socialism and only through its adoption was prosperity achieved.

      The author claims that under communism China was poor and only when it became capitalist did it begin to prosper, failing to mention that until the USA gave it the green light, the countries belonging to the empire of the USA embargoed China (and Russia) and cut it off from a significant amount of world trade. The same goes for eastern Europe, formerly members of the Warsaw Pact. Yet it is under Chinese (and Russian) communism that the living standards and life expectancy of the Chinese improved massively while its capitalist contemporaries often as not languished in poverty and economic backwardness (and in many cases still do).

    2. Rocky Mtn Stevie Avatar
      Rocky Mtn Stevie

      During my fifty years of working full-time, I paid about twenty percent of my income in federal taxes. And what did this government do with my money? They murdered between twenty-five and thirty million people in nations around the world….and not one of those nations ever attacked us…not one of them ever, even threatened us. This was before 9-11 and we still don’t know exactly who did that….but there is only one nation that has ever intentionally killed U.S. service men……can you guess which one that is?

  2. paul edwards Avatar

    Is there anyone in America who thinks the U.S. Empire gives a goddam what its people think or what happens to them? America is a dying hegemon, a cratering empire built for and owned by its Capitalist criminal elite, now, in terminal decline, thrashing around and baiting powerful rising nations that can burn it down if that is what it insists on.

  3. Jerry Alatalo Avatar

    It’s difficult to refute the points made by Mr. Hornberger in his article.

  4. Kevin Fitzmaurice-Brown Avatar
    Kevin Fitzmaurice-Brown

    fine except China was Communist not socialist . It is evolving toward socialism rapidly. Russia was poor due to USA/UK theft of their recourses and Putin took back those recourses for the people and even offered BP etc up to 50% shares. Even then Russia was becoming true socialist. and has been for 25 years.

  5. Kevin Fitzmaurice-Brown Avatar
    Kevin Fitzmaurice-Brown

    Of course USA is not interested in ‘commy ‘ or socialist and. knows no difference.Anyway Simply blames other countries for its own terrible failings of the debt slave society and destruction of manufacturing which it ( with Israel ) imposed on the world only to end up bankrupt itself.