The Russia–Iran–China search for a new global security order

While the collective west is in the grips of an existential legitimacy crisis, the RIC is devising its own security order to protect the rest of the world from the ‘genocidals.’

By Pepe Escobar

The Hegemon has no idea what awaits the Exceptionalist mindset: China has started to decisively stir the civilizational cauldron without bothering about an inevitable array of sanctions coming by early 2025 and/or a possible collapse of the international financial system. 

Last week, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and his list of delusional US demands was welcomed in Beijing by Foreign Minister Wang Yi and President Xi Jinping as little more than an annoying gnat. Wang, on the record, stressed that Tehran was justified in defending itself against Israel’s shredding of the Vienna Convention when it attacked the Iranian consulate in Damascus. 

At the UN Security Council, China now openly questions not only the state terror attack on the Nord Streams but also the US–Israel combo’s blocking of Palestinian statehood. Moreover, Beijing, just like Moscow recently, hosts Palestine’s political factions together in a conference aiming to unify their positions.   

Next Tuesday, only two days before Moscow celebrates Victory Day, the end of the Great Patriotic War, Xi will land in Belgrade to remind the whole world about the 25th anniversary of the bombing of the Chinese embassy by the US, UK, and NATO. 

Russia, meanwhile, provided a platform for the UNRWA – the UN relief agency for Palestinian refugees, which Israel has sought to defund – to explain to high representatives of BRICS-10 the cataclysmic humanitarian situation in Gaza, as described by UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini. 

In short, serious political business is already being conducted outside of the corrupted UN system, as the United Nations disintegrates into a corporate shell with the US dictating all terms as the largest shareholder. 

Yet another key example of BRICS as the new UN: Russian Security Council chairman Nikolai Patrushev met in St. Petersburg with his Chinese counterpart Chen Wenqing on the sidelines of the 12th International Security Summit, congregating over 100 nations, including the security heads of BRICS-10 members Iran, India, Brazil, and South Africa, as well as Iraq. 

The SCO security show

But the key crossroads these past few days was the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) defense summit in Astana,

azakhstan. For the first time, the new Chinese Defense Minister, Dong Jun, met with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Shoigu, to emphasize their comprehensive strategic partnership. 

Dong, significantly, stressed the “dynamic” nature of China–Russia military interaction, while Shoigu doubled down, saying it “sets a model for interstate relations” based on mutual respect and shared strategic interests. 

Addressing the full SCO assembly, Shoigu emphatically refuted the massive western propaganda drive about a Russian “threat” to NATO. 

Everybody was at the SCO defense ministers’ meeting – including, at the same table, India, Iran, Pakistan, and Belarus as an observer. Minsk is eager to join the SCO. 

The interlocking Russia–Iran–China strategic partnerships were totally in sync. Apart from Dong meeting Shoigu, he also met Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Ashtiani, who lavishly praised Beijing’s condemnation of the Israeli terror air strike in Damascus. 

What is happening now between Beijing and Tehran is a replay of what started last year between Moscow and Tehran, when a member of the Iranian delegation on a visit to Russia remarked that both parties had agreed on a mutual, high-level “anything you need” relationship.  

In Astana, Dong’s support for Iran was unmistakable. Not only did he invite Ashtiani to a security conference in Beijing, mirroring the Iranian position, he also called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the delivery of humanitarian aid.   

Shoigu, meeting with Ashtiani, provided extra context when he recalled that “the joint fight against international terrorism in Syria is a vivid example of our long-standing friendly relations.” The Russian defense minister then delivered his clincher: 

The current military-political situation and threats to our states oblige us … to common approaches to building a just world order based on equality for all participants in the international community.

A new global security order

Establishing a new global security order is right at the heart of BRICS-10 planning – on par with the de-dollarization debate. All of this is anathema to the collective west, which is incapable of understanding the multifaceted, intertwined Russia, Iran, and China partnerships.   

And the interaction goes on in person. Russian President Vladimir Putin will be visiting Beijing later this month. On Gaza, the Russia–Iran–China position is in complete sync: Israel is committing genocide. For the EU – and NATOstan as a whole – this is not genocide: the bloc supports Israel no matter what.

After Iran, on 13 April, changed the game in West Asia for good, without even using their finest hypersonic missiles, the key question for the Global Majority is stark: in the end, who will restrain the genocidals, and how? Diplomatic sources hint this will be discussed face-to-face by Putin and Xi. 

As one Chinese scholar, with unique aplomb, remarks: 

This time, the barbarians are facing a 5,000-year continuing written civilization, armed with Sun Tzu’s Art of War, Mao thought, Xi’s dual circulation strategy, Belt and Road, BRICS, renminbi digitalization, Russia and China unlimited, the world’s most powerful manufacturing industry, tech supremacy, economic powerhouse, and the backing of the Global South.

All that against a polarized Hegemon in turmoil, with its genocidal aircraft carrier in West Asia totally spinning out of control.

US threats of a “clear choice” between ending several key strands of the Russia–China strategic partnership or facing a sanctions tsunami don’t cut it in Beijing. The same applies to Washington’s wishful attempts at preventing BRICS members from ditching the US dollar. 

this is definitely a “non-agreement capable” Empire, as Lavrov has been emphasizing since late 2021.

Yaroslav Lisovolik, founder of BRICS+ Analytics, dismisses the Hegemon’s threats against BRICS as the road map toward an alternative payment system is still in its infancy. As for Russia–China trade, the non-dollar high-speed train has already left the station. 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has made it quite clear that Moscow and Beijing have nearly reached the point of abandoning the US dollar in bilateral trade. And the outright theft of Russian assets by the collective west is the ultimate red line for BRICS – and all other nations watching with horror – as a whole: this this is definitely a “non-agreement capable” Empire, as Lavrov has been emphasizing since late 2021.

Yet the key question remains: how will Russia–Iran–China (RIC), as BRICS leaders, SCO members, and simultaneously top three “existential threats” to the Hegemon, be able to start implementing a new global security architecture without staring down the genocidals. 

Click Here To Get Your FREE Newsletter No Advertising – No Government Grants – This Is Independent Media

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

10 responses to “The Russia–Iran–China search for a new global security order”

  1. David Avatar
    David

    The sooner Amerika is radically defenestrated, the better. The utter destruction of the Zionist Entity, aka Lesser Shitholia, is of existential import.

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    If or when NATO as a multilateral force enters Ukraine as an invasion force it will be the spark that will set the tone for our lifetimes in what the outcome becomes. Outrage over Gaza yes, but I don’t see the world making that the future test, Ukraine is the hot button of our time.

  3. scrdmgl Avatar

    The members of the Axis of Evil, as described by the genocidal monster, the United States of America, know very well that once Russia is liquidated (a wet dream), China is next, followed by Iran, Korea, and everybody else so considered. Therefore, nothing but a forceful response to any and all attacks, is the only possible response. No rational person or regime, believes in or is motivated by death and destruction. Of course, unless you’re pushed against the wall. Unfortunately, that is today’s reality, forced upon the world.

  4.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    What would Buddha say about all this? Let’s not be confrontational, let’s be patient, try to understand the racist supremacist attitudes of ‘the West’ as they face decline in their Hegemonic status. I think China is acting more Buddhist than Russia. I know Russia is threatened by NATO’s expansion but it might be time to concede or compromise a bit. As for Iran, their suffering at the hands of the west is so much more recent and so severe it is easier to appreciate their position. Anyhow I think nuclear war is the absolute worst possibility and everything should be avoiding that.

    1. scrdmgl Avatar

      Nuclear war is a self-defeating abomination to be avoided, no doubt. However, as long as conventional military means are available, they must be used as a deterrent policy, alternative obviously rejected by Putin. People, due to sheer ignorance, consider the present confrontation in Ukraine as war, which it is not. Any expert on the subject will tell you so, in fact, given its proven second-to-none military capabilities in land, sea, and space, Russia would have ended this conflict in a few days early on. Even today, it is more a police action against a murderous Nazi supremacist regime, but still no war as Russia fought against Germany in WWII.

  5. rilme35bba Avatar
    rilme35bba

    “this is definitely a “non-agreement capable” Empire”
    Not exactly, it is a “non-agreement-capable” Empire

    The first is an empire that is capable of non-agreement: it can disagree.
    The second is an empire that is incapable of agreement: it cannot agree.

    If this is hard to understand, consider the difference between “can not” and “cannot”.

    1. braithwa842 Avatar

      Clearly you are correct, but what is meant is neither of those things. What is meant is that the empire is quite capable of making agreements, but is very fickle and breaks those agreements whenever it feels like doing so. Is there a short and snappy phrase that expresses that?

  6. Scorpio-Dragon…landOfCali Avatar
    Scorpio-Dragon…landOfCali

    Trading one version of old 🌍world secualr(capitalism/communism-same thing🤭🤫) Monotheist CENTRALIZERS for another…no beueno💯no thx🙏🏽🙏🏻

    Hey old world “communists”(CENTRALIZERS) take the capitalists (CENTRALIZERS)back back back to the OLD 🌍 WORLD, with you 🫵🏿🫵🏻

    👽Invaders-1492-globalizers
    💂🏻occupiers-1776-interNATIONalizers

    2012-endgame-2012
    Starts…begins…began, and is well well under way!

    1)decentralize the lands…
    2)👽decolonize our mindz
    3)dismantle, piece by piece through peace😁with a nice big smile on our face
    4)demographics plays out

    Sorry old world🌍 communism , will not “save” replace old world 🌍 capitalism in the new world…in an attempt to up keep the old world systemic on the new world….🌎 “realm”💯🙏🏻🙏🏽

    1. Warrior mode🪶 Avatar
      Warrior mode🪶

      Replacing one version of the old world CENTRALIZERS….with another🤫🤭🤣

      No thx….

      No team “blue”(democrats) or team “red”(republicans)

      No team capitalists (blue) no team communists(red)….

      No thank you🤫🤭😁🙏🏽🙏🏻

      Try again old world peppi la-pew🦨

      1. braithwa842 Avatar

        Both Russia and China practice a blend somewhere between caplitalist and communist. I guess it comes down to what do you privatize. Is the water supply allowed to be privately owned? Is the public transport privately owned? What percentage of mineral wealth should the state place in private hands? Do you privatize prisons, the hospitals, the pharmaceutical industries and the arms industries. And the BIG ones: do you let those private interests, collectively referred to as the money, OWN and control the media and all politicians.

        At least that is how I interpret what you said. Perhaps you mean something totally different, and if so, then I am all ears. What economic model are you proposing?

        What is wrong with the western economic model is that the beneficiaries of industry X are permitted influence the media and to lobby and provide electoral funds for the parliament, where X is all of:-
        * The media
        * The arms industries
        * The prison industries
        * The pharmaceutical industries
        * Etc.

        The private interests get to influence the system, until it is rigged, and they then proclaim that “there is no alternative”. So private interests become billionaires with even more ability to own the the media and the politicians. It has led to a massive WEALTH INEQUALITY where we have billionaires and then we have a massive underclass, a massive homelessness. A massive drug problem follows poverty as surely as night follows day.

        It has also resulted in endless war, the most imprisoned population anywhere on the planet, the most expensive medical system on the planet, so that most people cant afford to see a doctor, the least healthy food etc, etc.

        This system has prevailed to the extreme, so that the media and every politician ARE NOW OWNED by those interests. The politicians make ZERO attempt at solving any of the above problems on behalf of the population. No, they only pretend to represent the population, while their actual remit is NOT to solve the above problems, but to make money by serving the billionaire class, giving the billionaire class more.

        China’s Huawei model is one where the only the employees may be shareholders. I notice that Huawei is far and away the most sanctioned of all the Chinese companies so far. Why? Because they have seen its success and they are afraid of it. This economic model clearly is the biggest threat to Western Capitalism. There is an alternative and they know they cant compete with that. Should such systems become popular across the planet, western civilization will be forced to adopt such practices, spreading wealth and undoing wealth inequality.

Leave a Comment – Now is not the time to remain silent. Be courtious to others, ignore those who engage in racist, ethnic or religious slurs

Discover more from Information Clearing House.info

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Information Clearing House.info

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading