By Richard Medhurst
Rothschild family, the most famous of all European banking dynasties, which for some 200 years exerted great influence on the economic and, indirectly, the political history of Europe. The house was founded by Mayer Amschel Rothschild (b. February 23, 1744. Continue
Richard Medhurst
YOUTUBE DEMONETIZED MY CHANNEL!
Please support me on Patreon: patreon.com/richardmedhurst
Click Here To Get Your FREE Newsletter No Advertising – No Government Grants – This Is Independent Media
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
Views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Comments
9 responses to “Rothschild: How Bankers Divided the Middle East to Create Israel”
Rest assured brothers and sisters that the Rothschild Dynasty is still alive and well, looking after business after all these years. Here we have and entity that must be raided, and dispossessed of all of its ill gotten riches with extreme prejudice. That action will unavoidably put a serious dent into Zionist power in the world.
The Rot$chi£ds are just one f£aKKK€ in the iceberg of WA$P financial sorcery needing di$mant£ing.
No use blowing away the iceberg if the mobster ideology g£aci€r$ keep on ca£ving.
There are queues of financial bergs eager to replace their $nowba££ing gr€€d.
Hard to disagree at all, but there are a few items left out of the discourse that anyone new to it all and wishing to explore more should know. First, I don’t mind his choice to pepper his diction with expletives, because Palestinians have every damn right to be extremely pissed off, and will have even more going forward after the Israeli/US genocide in Gaza. However, there can be little doubt that some, especially Zionists in the UK and their supporters, and even moreso those in America, will mock the speaker out of hand for his diction. Chronologically, looking at ‘political’ Zionism in the UK, one should look at Lord Shaftesbury and the powerful family and political connections in the government in the 1830s. Nur Masalha’s “Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History” includes an excellent summary of their ambitions toward returning Jews to Palestine. Further, the Rothschild family had begun funding small cooperatives of Jewish settlers in Palestine during the last decades of the 19th century, during Ottoman rule in the Levant. It’s not like Balfour just sent a letter to Rothschild in 1917. He got the letter probably because the government decided to make a public statement of policy intention, and the Rothschild family had been at it for 30 years preceding Balfour. Further, the speaker definitely leaves out the most important of Britain’s treaties, though he does allude to it in his talk about Lawrence: the Sharif of Mecca Hussein-General Henry McMahon correspondence, a series of back and forth letters (in 1915, not 1916 as the speaker said) for which General McMahon was THE British official on the ground (stationed in Cairo, which the British had attacked and occupied in 1885) on behalf of His Majesty’s Government in London. These letters promised that IF under the aegis of Shariff Hussein, the Arab forces would join with the British in expelling the weakening Ottoman empire out of the Levant, which became a Middle Eastern theater of WW1, then HMG would in fact recognize the independence of the Arab states that would be formed after the Ottoman departure. The two very best, detailed sources I know of on this ‘treaty level’ correspondence, are the following: J.M.N. Jeffries, “Palestine the Reality: The Inside Story of the Balfour Declaration 1917-1938”, by the British journalist Jeffries, on the ground in Palestine at that time; and a Palestinian intellectual who later served the British as an administrator during the British Mandate years 1922-1948, George Antonius, “The Arab Awakening: The Story of the Arab National Movement”. Without a doubt, these two accounts should cause anyone who doubts the legality of what the Zionist lobbying of the British government accomplished after Theodor Herzl’s first Zionist Congress in 1897…to have serious second thoughts. As far as what happened after, when Britain betrayed its quid pro quo arrangement and agreements to the Arabs with the 1916 secret Sykes-Picot agreement and then the Balfour Declaration in 19127, i.e. the incorporation of the Balfour Declaration (which was never intended to go past the fig leaf mention of protection of Arab rights…similar to the mention of ‘rights for all’ in Israel’s 1948 Declaration of Independence) into the League of Nations British Mandate for Palestine (as well as the French mandate for Lebanon and Syria), which I believe was just a British power play at the Versailles peace conference by the world’s then greatest power….all of that post 1917 was completely unpacked just LAST WEEK at the International Court of Justice hearings on the ‘legality’ of the Israeli occupation of Palestine by Dr. Ralph Wilde: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yhbx6iplYNY
Sorry, forgot one important document. Before that, let me mention that Doreen Ingrams painstaking collection, “The Palestine Papers 1917-1922: Seeds of Conflict”, of the exact words of all the important players inside the British government and some without during the debate and struggle over the Balfour Declaration, is a must read for context of how contentious this policy idea was. Now, Woodrow Wilson was, along with Lloyd-George of Britain and Clemenceau of France, one of the three great players at Versailles. Absent from the US for six months, he wanted to implement his policy from his Fourteen Points, in Palestine, i.e. self-determination. He proposed a committee to survey the inhabitants of the Levant. Britain and France played along that they would participate, but since having already decided in 1916 in the Sykes-Picot Agreement how they intended to split up the spoils of the war against the Ottomans, they backed out at the last minute. Wilson sent two representatives, Professors King and Crane, to conduct the survey in the Levant. The King-Crane Commission survey is a vastly comprehensive questioning of all the peoples of the Levant, and decidedly showed almost total opposition to the British plan under the Balfour Declaration, except of course some in the Jewish community in Palestine who supported it. However, completed in 1919, Britain suppressed the 70 report….CURRENTLY AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET…until 1923 after it had arranged its ‘mandate’. Texts say that Wilson, who had grown sick and died, perhaps never even saw the final report. In my view, it was the very last time the US had clear intelligence that warned AGAINST the Zionist project that Britain had committed itself to.
All Arabs know these details.
the rothshit ,and rockafeller are one of the same.
Aaron Bushnell took the old bastard away.
For all I know the balfur declaration is a fake written in the 30s
After all, is nothing more than a piece of paper with some ink on it and a “doggy signature”
Thx for sharing anyway.
Here my latest on Gaza
https://mywisdom.substack.com/p/light-on-a-genocide
The dominant influence of the Rothschild family in financing and promoting the award of Palestine to Israel is well know and does not need detailed explanation about how the family manipulated their political clout to the creation of Israel. However it would be interesting to find out how they managed to do it.
I am already a subscriber to ICH and contributor to its finance appeals.
I have read “Gods of Money” by F. William Engdahl. It will add a great deal to your narrative.